Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262181AbVANVYJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:24:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262171AbVANVWa (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:22:30 -0500 Received: from mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]:37628 "EHLO mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbVANVWL (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:22:11 -0500 Message-ID: <41E8565A.4050707@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:31:38 +0000 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Steiner Cc: Andres Salomon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10-as1 References: <1105605448.7316.13.camel@localhost> <41E7F44C.5010702@bio.ifi.lmu.de> In-Reply-To: <41E7F44C.5010702@bio.ifi.lmu.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 19 Frank Steiner wrote: > When I take an unpatched 2.6.10 and apply only the 033 patch, it fails, > too. Is it possible that the rlimit patch needs some more patches from > the bitkeeper repository to work correctly? And that those patches > are missing in the -as1? Or is the patch just wrong? > > Can anyone confirm this problem? I attach my config for the full -as1 > tree kernel and a strace log for some segfaulting mount. Hope this helps! I can confirm this. For me, fsck exits with sig11 during bootup sequence, which causes my init scripts to think my root partition is dead. Investigating now... Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/