Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262144AbVAOBYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:24:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262089AbVAOBVF (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:21:05 -0500 Received: from opersys.com ([64.40.108.71]:62472 "EHLO www.opersys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262103AbVAOBRy (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:17:54 -0500 Message-ID: <41E87102.2090502@opersys.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:25:22 -0500 From: Karim Yaghmour Reply-To: karim@opersys.com Organization: Opersys inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr, fr-be, fr-ca, fr-fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tglx@linutronix.de CC: Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 References: <20050114002352.5a038710.akpm@osdl.org> <1105740276.8604.83.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41E85123.7080005@opersys.com> <1105747280.13265.72.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <20050114162652.73283f2e.akpm@osdl.org> <1105750810.13265.126.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1105750810.13265.126.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 30 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I do not accept unnecessary complexity in the kernel, when you are able > to achieve the same goal by putting more thoughts into the > postprocessing. The kernel code is responsible to provide a simple and > fast interface for those tasks and nothing more. I don't see the point > why we need 150k additional code with limitations/problems, which are > even obvious without running it, instead of a simple interface to > userland where different postprocessors can compete to do the job more > or less perfect. You have previously demonstrated that you do not understand the implementation you are criticizing. You keep repeating the size of the patch like a mantra, yet when pressed for actual bits of code that need fixing, you use a circular argument to slip away. If you feel that there is some unncessary processing being done in the kernel, please show me the piece of code affected so that it can be fixed if it is broken. Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/