Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262110AbVAOBkx (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:40:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262114AbVAOBkx (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:40:53 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:47593 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262110AbVAOBjH (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:39:07 -0500 Subject: Re: security contact draft From: Alan Cox To: Chris Wright Cc: Florian Weimer , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050113141229.G24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050113125503.C469@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87mzvd9f9a.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20050113141229.G24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1105744352.9838.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:33:14 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 15 On Iau, 2005-01-13 at 22:12, Chris Wright wrote: > > UNIRAS and probably others require NDAs from affected software vendors > > before they share vulnerability information. It makes things easier > > if you state upfront that you won't play such games. > > Fair point, I can add that easily. Is it worth adding the stipulation up front about who sets release dates and within what limit as well > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/