Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262470AbVAPKHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:07:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262471AbVAPKHT (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:07:19 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:38116 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262470AbVAPKHG (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:07:06 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: hugang@soulinfo.com Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm3: swsusp: out of memory on resume (was: Re: Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:07:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <200501152220.42129.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050116055420.GA11880@hugang.soulinfo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050116055420.GA11880@hugang.soulinfo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501161107.24883.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2394 Lines: 50 On Sunday, 16 of January 2005 06:54, hugang@soulinfo.com wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:20:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 > > > > > > -> 2005-1-14.core.diff core patch TEST PASSED > > > > > > -> 2005-1-14.x86_64.diff x86_64 patch NOT TESTED > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, on x86_64 it goes south on suspend, probably somwhere in write_pagedir(), > > > > > but I'm not quite sure as I can't make it print any useful stuff to the serial console > > > > > (everything is dumped to a virtual tty only). Seemingly, it prints some > > > > > "write_pagedir: ..." debug messages and then starts to print garbage in > > > > > an infinite loop. > > > > I have some good news for you. :-) > > > > The patch actually works fine on my box. What I thought was a result of an infinite loop, > > turned out to be "only" a debug output from it, which is _really_ excessive. After I had > > commented out the most of pr_debug()s in your code, it works nicely and I like it very > > much. Thanks a lot for porting it to x86_64! > > > Cool, Current I making software suspend also works in Qemu X86_64 > emulation, Here is a update patch to making copyback more safed and > possible to improve copyback speed. > > I change the swsusp_arch_resume to nosave section, the in memory copy > back it not touch this code. before not change that to nosave section, > I'm also geting a infinite loop in copy_one_page, From the qemu in_asm, > I sure that loop in copy_one_page, when I change it to nosave section, > that problem go away, I dont' sure tha't good idea to fixed it, but > current it works in my qemu, Can someone owner x86_64 test it. > > I disable Flush TLB after copy page, It speedup the in qemu, But I can't > sure the right thing in real machine, can someone give me point. Could you, please, make a patch against -rc1-mm1 with your previous patch applied? It would be much easier to apply. :-) Greets, RJW -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/