Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262645AbVAPXWw (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:22:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262648AbVAPXWw (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:22:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:12698 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262645AbVAPXWu (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:22:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:22:24 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Jack O'Quin" Cc: Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Lee Revell , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, arjanv@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM Message-ID: <20050116232224.GD24610@elte.hu> References: <20050107134941.11cecbfc.akpm@osdl.org> <20050107221059.GA17392@infradead.org> <20050107142920.K2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87mzvkxxck.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050111212139.GA22817@elte.hu> <87ekgnwaqx.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050115144302.GG10114@elte.hu> <87r7kmuw3i.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <87r7kmf8kg.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <87y8euc7x9.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y8euc7x9.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1546 Lines: 34 * Jack O'Quin wrote: > Studying the test script, I discovered that it starts a separate > program running in the background. So, I hacked the script to run it > with nice -15 in order not to interfere with the realtime threads. The > XRUNS didn't get much better, but the maximum delay went way down, > from 1/2 sec to a much more believable (but still too high) 32.5 msec. > I ran this with the same patched scheduler. > This supports my intuition that lack of per-thread granularity is the > main problem. Where I was able to isolate some non-realtime code and > run it at lower priority, it helped quite a bit. ok, makes perfect sense. My suggestion for the next step would be to try nice() or setpriority() to do priority isolation. If that experiment works out fine (i.e. the xrun count is comparable to the SCHED_FIFO case) then it would also be nice to do a nice --19 run (under the hacked kernel), which is a priority level that doesnt have starvation turned off in the patched kernel but is otherwise very close in behavior to nice --20. i.e. as an end result we'd have the following 3 priority setups compared: SCHED_FIFO:RT-prio-1, SCHED_NORMAL:nice--20, SCHED_NORMAL:nice--19. The (ideal) goal would be for them to have near-identical audio-latency performance. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/