Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262716AbVAQHbR (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:31:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262717AbVAQHbQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:31:16 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:62905 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262716AbVAQHbO (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:31:14 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alban Browaeys Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Audit Project? Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <41EB6691.10905@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 82.125.129.199 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Galeon/1.3.18.99 (Debian package 1.3.18+arch20050108-1)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 655 Lines: 10 John Richard Moser comcast.net> writes: > Is there an official Linux Kernel Audit Project to actively and > aggressively security audit all patches going into the Linux Kernel, or > do they just get a cursory scan for bugs and obvious screwups? >From a user point of view , there is at least tracking: patches are signed and approved by the "component" maintenair before reaching mainline. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/