Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262769AbVAQL0i (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:26:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262770AbVAQL0i (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:26:38 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:20387 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262769AbVAQL0f (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:26:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:26:11 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andi Kleen , Adrian Bunk , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x8664_ksyms.c: unexport register_die_notifier Message-ID: <20050117112611.GK29270@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050116074649.GW4274@stusta.de> <20050117092654.GB29270@wotan.suse.de> <1105955659.6304.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050117101318.GF29270@wotan.suse.de> <1105960768.6304.69.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105960768.6304.69.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 34 On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:19:28PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 11:13 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 10:26 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 08:46:49AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > The only user of register_die_notifier (kernel/kprobes.c) can't be > > > > > built modular. Therefore, it's the EXPORT_SYMBOL is superfluous. > > > > > > > > Please don't apply this, it was especially intended for modular debuggers. > > > > There is already a hacvked kdb around that uses it. > > > > > > eh didn't Tigran just mail lkml claiming that kdb and x86-64 really > > > don't mix ?? > > > > It cannot display function arguments and uses imprecise backtrace right now > > (like normal oopses), other than that it works just fine. > > does it need any other kernel patches? Because if it does it might as > well patch this export in for it's specialist use The modular kdb needs other patches right now yes, but I would still like to keep it for other debuggers. Previously we always had tons of ugly patchkit comming with every debugging add on and the exception notifiers were exactly designed to provide a clean interface for everybody for this. I definitely don't want to go back to the old "own patch for everbody" mess again on x86-64. -Andi > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/