Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261510AbVAQPKa (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:10:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261264AbVAQPKa (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:10:30 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:46229 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261510AbVAQPJl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:09:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:04:27 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Udo van den Heuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VIA Rhine ethernet driver bug Message-ID: <20050117120427.GA20370@logos.cnet> References: <001001c4faf7$71a26230$450aa8c0@hierzo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001001c4faf7$71a26230$450aa8c0@hierzo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2777 Lines: 59 On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:43:33PM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Hello, > > On my firewall (VIA EPIA CL-6000 with VIA Rhine network chips running FC3 > and custom kernels) I see messages like: > > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x4 length 0 status 00000600! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80040 vs > ccf80040. > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x5 length 0 status 00000400! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80050 vs > ccf80050. > > [...] > > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0xf length 0 status 00000400! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf800f0 vs > ccf800f0. > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x0 length 0 status 00000400! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80000 vs > ccf80000. > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x1 length 0 status 00000400! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80010 vs > ccf80010. > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x2 length 0 status 00000400! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80020 vs > ccf80020. > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple > buffers, entry 0x3 length 0 status 00000581! > Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame ccf80030 vs > ccf80030. > > every 3 or 4 days or so when I really use the card. (please notice all 16 > entries are used and the length is 0) > Eth1 is connected to an Alcatel Speedtouch Home at 10 Mbits, Half Duplex. > This problem did not occur when I wsa using other hardware for the firewall. > > While googlin' I saw that this is an old bug which was not fixed for years. > I am in contact with the maintainer and currently am trying to see what > effect a smaller mtu and/or older driver versions might have. > > Because of the impact of this nasty bug (many users have these chips in > their hardware) I would like to ask if others could have a look into this > problem as well. Please email me your experiences (2.6.x kernel? Same bug or > no problem? Fixes? Etc). > PLEASE help! What kernel version are you using? Its important to inform that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/