Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 02:37:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 02:36:54 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:693 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 02:36:40 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15166.50418.583094.554723@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:36:34 -0700 (PDT) To: Aaron Lehmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com Subject: Re: Linux speed on sun4c In-Reply-To: <20010630220612.C14361@vitelus.com> In-Reply-To: <20010630220612.C14361@vitelus.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Aaron Lehmann writes: > > NetBSD/Sparc's FAQ asserts: > > Why is NetBSD so much faster than SparcLinux on sun4c (top) > > The memory management hardware on sun4c machines (SPARCStation > 1, 1+, 2, IPC, IPX, SLC, ELC and clones) is not handled particularly > well by Linux. Until Linux reworks their MMU code NetBSD will be very > much faster on this hardware. > > Was there ever any truth to this statement? It seems to be light on > technical details. Have these purported issues ever been fixed? > > I don't want to be scared into running NetBSD on my SparcStation 2 :D. It's totally true, use *BSD on your sun4c systems if top performance is your desire. :-) I know how to fix it but frankly I have no desire to work on that platform any more. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/