Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 03:21:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 03:21:17 -0400 Received: from mail2.rdc2.bc.home.com ([24.2.10.85]:36594 "EHLO mail2.rdc2.bc.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 03:21:00 -0400 Message-ID: <002201c101fe$61dd0440$613d4c18@h24766197> From: "Gregory Finch" To: "Hua Zhong" Cc: In-Reply-To: <200107010639.CAA26485@razor.cs.columbia.edu> Subject: Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 00:21:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org GDI.EXE was moved into the kernel in winNT 4.0 and has been there ever since. M$ released a white paper about this claiming the "performance boost". worked great for me, but was one more thing to go wrong in kernel space, although they touched on that as well. it'd take me a bit to find a refernce or link for you, but i remember it well.. ;) -greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hua Zhong" Is Graphics really in the Windows kernel? I think GDI.EXE runs in user mode. > >Olaf Hering wrote: > >> kde.o. 2.5? > > > >Good idea! Graphics needs to be in the kernel to be fast. Windows > >proved that. > > thought SGI proved that :-) > > Martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/