Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261186AbVARIq2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:46:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261188AbVARIq2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:46:28 -0500 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:64150 "EHLO debian.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261186AbVARIqW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:46:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Instrumentation (was Re: 2.6.11-rc1-mm1) From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Roman Zippel , Tim Bird , LKML , Andrew Morton , Tom Zanussi , Richard J Moore In-Reply-To: <41EC50E6.2080706@opersys.com> References: <20050114002352.5a038710.akpm@osdl.org> <1105742791.13265.3.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41E8543A.8050304@am.sony.com> <1105794499.13265.247.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41E9CCEF.50401@opersys.com> <41E9EC5A.7070502@opersys.com> <1105919017.13265.275.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41EB1AEC.3000106@opersys.com> <1105957604.13265.388.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41EC2157.1070504@opersys.com> <1106000307.13265.462.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <41EC50E6.2080706@opersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:46:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1106037970.16877.21.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 (2.0.3-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1686 Lines: 49 On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:57 -0500, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > If we add another hardwired implementation then we do not have said > > benefits. > > Please stop handwaving. Folks like Andrew, Christoph, Zwane, Roman, > and others actually made specific requests for changes in the code. > What makes you think you're so special that you think you are > entitled to stay on the side and handwave about concepts. So the points you added to your todo list which were brought up by me are worthless ? I'm not handwaving. I started this RFC to move the discussion into a general discussion about instrumentation. A couple of people are seriosly interested to do this. If you are not interested then ignore the thread, but you're way not in a position to tell me to shut up. You turned this thread into your LTT prayer wheel. Roman pointed out your unwillingness to create a common framework before. But I have to disagree with him in one point. It's not amazing, it's annoying. > If there is a limitation with the code, please present actual > snippets that need to be changed and suggest alternatives. That's > what everyone else does on this list. I pointed you to actually broken code and you accused me of throwing mud. > Save the bandwidth Please remove me from cc, it's a good start to save bandwidth. > and start cleaning. Yes, I did already start cleaning cat ../broken-out/ltt* | patch -p1 -R tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/