Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261339AbVARPrl (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:47:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261330AbVARPrN (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:47:13 -0500 Received: from gizmo02ps.bigpond.com ([144.140.71.12]:8359 "HELO gizmo02ps.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261331AbVARPpr (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:45:47 -0500 Message-ID: <41ED2F1F.1080905@bigpond.net.au> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:45:35 +1100 From: Cal Reply-To: hihone@bigpond.net.au User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux , CK Kernel , joq@io.com, rlrevell@joe-job.com, paul@linuxaudiosystems.com Subject: Re: [ck] [PATCH][RFC] sched: Isochronous class for unprivileged soft rt scheduling References: <41ED08AB.5060308@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <41ED08AB.5060308@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000003, version=0.93.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 21 Con Kolivas wrote: > Comments and testing welcome. There's a collection of test summaries from jack_test3.2 runs at Tests were run with iso_cpu at 70, 90, 99, 100, each test was run twice. The discrepancies between consecutive runs (with same parameters) is puzzling. Also recorded were tests with SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR. Before drawing any hardball conclusions, verification of the results would be nice. At first glance, it does seem that we still have that fateful gap between "harm minimisation" (policy) and "zero tolerance" (audio reality requirement). cheers, Cal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/