Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:05:00 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Martins Krikis <mkrikis@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iswraid and 2.4.x?
Message-ID: <20050118150500.GA27635@logos.cnet>
References: <20041011111943.GA32430@logos.cnet> <20050118172816.21090.qmail@web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050118172816.21090.qmail@web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1243
Lines: 36

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:28:16AM -0800, Martins Krikis wrote:
> --- Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
> 
> > It seems the general consensus is to merge iswraid, so I'm fine with
> > it.
> > 
> > Martins, we are approaching -rc stage, I would prefer the merge to
> > happen 
> > at the beginning of 2.4.29-pre. Is that fine for you?
> 
> Marcelo,
> 
> I seemed to have missed the 2.4.29-pre stages, unfortunately.
> Are you planning on a 2.4.30, too? I'd still love to get
> iswraid accepted in the 2.4 tree eventually...
> 
> The version that's out on SourceForge right now would be alright
> as is with the 2.4.29-x kernels, if that's any help. In about a
> week I'm planning to have a new version that adds RAID10 support
> for the ICH7R-based machines. Please let me know what my options
> are (if any) regarding getting iswraid in 2.4.

Hi Martins,

My feeling at the moment is to avoid any merges if possible - only
critical stuff for v2.4. 

> Thanks very much,

Sorry!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/