Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261418AbVARUzR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:55:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261419AbVARUzQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:55:16 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.196]:22387 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261418AbVARUzK (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:55:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=IBhpj1MHL3oQkMjFE/+W8a4FVvYFObVOoxrNejM2eq4iDPZSUMZi9u8NbqF73aAdFBtdqMESoIjwRVATqu/gwgB8l17MbbyeBctHZXKVz/KxsxC3X5nbsbCKMH3/BrK0o+Op7FhxGSUNG24OQ7I1+o2KZBpjW/U0xR/rELVLOpc= Message-ID: <58cb370e050118125536c17538@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:55:09 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Martins Krikis Subject: Re: iswraid and 2.4.x? Cc: Jeff Garzik , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20050118195621.15879.qmail@web30202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41ED56B5.8000603@pobox.com> <20050118195621.15879.qmail@web30202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 32 Hi, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0800 (PST), Martins Krikis wrote: > --- Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Check your inbox from months ago ;-) AFAICS his current version > > addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit > > lkml 6 > > months(?) ago... > > > > I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure. > > Jeff, > > As long as 2.4.30 is planned at all, I have no more > worries for the moment. But if so, then please don't > waste your time looking over the current version. In > about a week there should really be another one out. > It will add RAID10, and get rid of the "claim disks > for RAID" mis-feature. I'll let everybody know, of course. I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels? Thanks, Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/