Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261429AbVARVSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:18:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261430AbVARVSR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:18:17 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204]:59930 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261429AbVARVRo (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:17:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YZXCSooOwQoMnLACMP2hFZNDtoubTBAqM6i6zez7flq/m4xoPVVgmgYVR+ynqajL6nXXPFQF4soYAHBAFnda08uB1IXjx9Wa1hHa9LjPcA6iqmiLN5vMLrTUrER/NjLe8dlx+tRYLHkRgtnON0WSaE9VH/c4G2q2cZbru9ZgS+0= Message-ID: <58cb370e05011813176078d62d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:17:44 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: iswraid and 2.4.x? Cc: Martins Krikis , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <41ED7C38.3080201@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41ED56B5.8000603@pobox.com> <20050118195621.15879.qmail@web30202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <58cb370e050118125536c17538@mail.gmail.com> <41ED7C38.3080201@pobox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1451 Lines: 43 On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:14:32 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0800 (PST), Martins Krikis > > wrote: > > > >>--- Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Check your inbox from months ago ;-) AFAICS his current version > >>>addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit > >>>lkml 6 > >>>months(?) ago... > >>> > >>>I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure. > >> > >>Jeff, > >> > >>As long as 2.4.30 is planned at all, I have no more > >>worries for the moment. But if so, then please don't > >>waste your time looking over the current version. In > >>about a week there should really be another one out. > >>It will add RAID10, and get rid of the "claim disks > >>for RAID" mis-feature. I'll let everybody know, of course. > > > > > > I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use > > RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels? > > Intel or 'md' metadata? Intel > You need dmraid to use the Intel proprietary format. I'm not sure if it > supports RAID10 yet, but it supports the other levels. I know about other levels, I'm asking about RAID10. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/