Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261825AbVASRoU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:44:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261812AbVASRoU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:44:20 -0500 Received: from ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.60]:57834 "EHLO ylpvm29.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261797AbVASRna (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:43:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:41:40 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Pavel Machek , George Anzinger , john stultz , Andrea Arcangeli , Zwane Mwaikambo , Con Kolivas , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch Message-ID: <20050119174140.GE14545@atomide.com> References: <20050119000556.GB14749@atomide.com> <20050119113642.GA1358@elf.ucw.cz> <20050119171106.GA14545@atomide.com> <1106155850.6310.161.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1106155850.6310.161.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1615 Lines: 37 * Arjan van de Ven [050119 09:31]: > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:11 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Pavel Machek [050119 03:32]: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > As this patch is related to the VST/High-Res timers, there > > > > are probably various things that can be merged. I have not > > > > yet looked at what all could be merged. > > > > > > > > I'd appreciate some comments and testing! > > > > > > Good news is that it does seem to reduce number of interrupts. Bad > > > news is that time now runs faster (like "sleep 10" finishes in ~5 > > > seconds) and that I could not measure any difference in power > > > consumption. > > > > Thanks for trying it out. I have quite accurate time here on my > > systems, and sleep works as it should. I wonder what's happening on > > your system? If you have a chance, could you please post the results > > from following simple tests? > > tsc is dangerous for this btw; several cpus go either slower or stop tsc > entirely during hlt... eg when idle. > I would suggest to not include a tsc driver for this (otherwise really > cool) feature. Yeah, I just started with what was running on my old box :) I'll make it a separate Kconfig option with notes on that. The TSC timer is currently as accurate as without dyn-tick, but the ACPI PM timer's accuracy suffers a bit for some reason. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/