Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:12:08 +0100
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
       john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
       Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch
Message-ID: <20050119191208.GC12647@dualathlon.random>
References: <20050119000556.GB14749@atomide.com> <20050119094342.GB25623@elf.ucw.cz> <20050119171323.GB14545@atomide.com> <20050119174858.GB12647@dualathlon.random> <20050119181947.GF14545@atomide.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050119181947.GF14545@atomide.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 822
Lines: 15

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:19:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> If you have a chance, can you please provide me with some more info
> on your system, see my recent reply to Pavel in this thread for the

It's a normal UP athlon 1ghz, it should be quite widespread hardware.
I know at least another system that had the problem of system time going
in the future with 2.6 at the same rate of mine. Still it could be an
hardware issue after all if nobody else can reproduce it. At HZ=100 the
system time is again perfectly accurate like in 2.4, so probably at least
the PIT is ok.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/