Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261866AbVASTfr (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:35:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261867AbVASTfr (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:35:47 -0500 Received: from ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.46]:1947 "EHLO ylpvm15.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261866AbVASTfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:35:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:34:20 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Pavel Machek , George Anzinger , john stultz , Zwane Mwaikambo , Con Kolivas , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch Message-ID: <20050119193419.GH14545@atomide.com> References: <20050119000556.GB14749@atomide.com> <20050119094342.GB25623@elf.ucw.cz> <20050119171323.GB14545@atomide.com> <20050119174858.GB12647@dualathlon.random> <20050119181947.GF14545@atomide.com> <20050119191208.GC12647@dualathlon.random> <20050119191731.GG14545@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050119191731.GG14545@atomide.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1466 Lines: 31 * Tony Lindgren [050119 11:20]: > * Andrea Arcangeli [050119 11:12]: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:19:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > If you have a chance, can you please provide me with some more info > > > on your system, see my recent reply to Pavel in this thread for the > > > > It's a normal UP athlon 1ghz, it should be quite widespread hardware. > > I know at least another system that had the problem of system time going > > in the future with 2.6 at the same rate of mine. Still it could be an > > hardware issue after all if nobody else can reproduce it. At HZ=100 the > > system time is again perfectly accurate like in 2.4, so probably at least > > the PIT is ok. > > I've tested it with a celeron a300 box, tyan s2460 dual athlon, > tyan tiger 100 dual p3, and fujitsu p1110 crusoe laptop. Fujitsu I > may not have tested with TSC, but others work with both ACPI PM > timer and TSC. > > Maybe try disabling or enabling ACPI PM timer? Or maybe it does not > use TSC or ACPI PM timer, and that there's some bug in my patch that > kills the plain PIT timer? It could be HPET that kills it. I don't have any boxes with HPET timer, can you try without HPET? Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/