Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:07:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "Jack O'Quin" <joq@io.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
       Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, arjanv@redhat.com,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
Message-ID: <20050120080720.GB12665@elte.hu>
References: <20050116231307.GC24610@elte.hu> <87vf9xdj18.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050117100633.GA3311@elte.hu> <87llaruy6m.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050118080218.GB615@elte.hu> <87pt02pt0r.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050119082433.GE29037@elte.hu> <20050119143927.GA11950@elte.hu> <87651tmhwv.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050119183202.GM12076@waste.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050119183202.GM12076@waste.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 682
Lines: 20


* Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:

> > Or, should that be?
> > 
> > 	if (prio > 0 && prio <= 20 && policy != SCHED_NORMAL) {
> 
> Or you can just drop the 'prio == 1 &&' part for this test. Ingo was
> trying to be clever to allow some RT bits, but that's not really
> necessary.

actually, there may be some kernel threads that may run at RT priority
99. But i agree, dropping the test for prio==1 should work just as fine.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/