Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261577AbVATSXt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:23:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261578AbVATSWA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:22:00 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:56587 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261608AbVATSPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:15:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:15:27 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: len.brown@intel.com Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC: 2.6 patch] i386: unexport acpi_strict Message-ID: <20050120181527.GF3174@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 764 Lines: 23 I haven't found any possible modular usage of acpi_strict. Is the patch below correct? Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- linux-2.6.11-rc1-mm2-full/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c.old 2005-01-20 18:15:48.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc1-mm2-full/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c 2005-01-20 18:16:09.000000000 +0100 @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ int acpi_lapic; int acpi_ioapic; int acpi_strict; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_strict); acpi_interrupt_flags acpi_sci_flags __initdata; int acpi_sci_override_gsi __initdata; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/