Message-Id: <200501201921.j0KJLVsG005475@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix ea-in-inode default ACL creation 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:09:24 +0100."
             <1106248164.15959.69.camel@winden.suse.de> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <1106245344.15959.13.camel@winden.suse.de> <200501201856.j0KIuiif016865@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
            <1106248164.15959.69.camel@winden.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1106248889_12559P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:21:30 -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1191
Lines: 34

--==_Exmh_1106248889_12559P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:09:24 +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher said:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 19:56, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > [...] I'm failing to see how adding *another* zero operation [...] is going to help the
> > fact [...]
> 
> It's an ancient kernel hackers trick:  ;)
> > +		EXT3_I(inode)->i_state &= ~EXT3_STATE_NEW;

Damn. I saw every *other* line of the patch but that one. Literally.

(Make note to self - if a cold is making your eyes water and itch too
much to wear your contacts, you probably can't see well enough to read code ;)

--==_Exmh_1106248889_12559P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFB8AS5cC3lWbTT17ARAulzAKDp6ASmYSD77j38+bfZlsb46EHQcQCgiRks
V3Kju2ynKRlh4jjt8D2WfTc=
=xsEj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1106248889_12559P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/