Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262305AbVAUHMP (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:12:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262155AbVAUHMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:12:14 -0500 Received: from news.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:27530 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262305AbVAUHLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:11:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:11:44 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" Cc: Andi Kleen , Adrian Bunk , Janos Farkas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Bruner , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Matt Domsch Subject: Re: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE increasing in 2.6.11-rc1-bk6 Message-ID: <20050121071144.GB657@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050119231322.GA2287@lk8rp.mail.xeon.eu.org> <20050120162807.GA3174@stusta.de> <20050120164829.GG450@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 765 Lines: 19 > I really suggest to push this limit to 4k. My reason is that under UML I > need to put a lot of stuff in command line and uml crash if I not extend > this limit. Can we make it depend on arhitecture? It's dependent on the architecture already. I would like to enable it on i386/x86-64 because the kernel command line is often used to pass parameters to installers, and having a small limit there can be awkward. But first need to figure out what went wrong with EDD. Matt D., do you have thoughts on this? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/