Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262459AbVAUSuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:50:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262462AbVAUSuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:50:11 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:54171 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262459AbVAUSuH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:50:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:50:01 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: Rik van Riel Cc: Chris Wright , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: seccomp for 2.6.11-rc1-bk8 Message-ID: <20050121105001.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050121100606.GB8042@dualathlon.random> <20050121120325.GA2934@elte.hu> <20050121093902.O469@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@redhat.com on Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:39:03PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 622 Lines: 16 * Rik van Riel (riel@redhat.com) wrote: > Yes, but do you care about the performance of syscalls > which the program isn't allowed to call at all ? ;) Heh, no, but it's for every syscall not just denied ones. Point is simply that ptrace (complexity aside) doesn't scale the same. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/