Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:54:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Jack O'Quin" <joq@io.com>
Cc: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
       linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, rlrevell@joe-job.com,
       CK Kernel <ck@vds.kolivas.org>, utz <utz@s2y4n2c.de>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, alexn@dsv.su.se,
       Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling
Message-ID: <20050122165458.GA14426@elte.hu>
References: <200501201542.j0KFgOwo019109@localhost.localdomain> <87y8eo9hed.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050120172506.GA20295@elte.hu> <87wtu6fho8.fsf@sulphur.joq.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87wtu6fho8.fsf@sulphur.joq.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1070
Lines: 29


* Jack O'Quin <joq@io.com> wrote:

> I finally made new kernel builds for the latest patches from both Ingo
> and Con.  I kept the two patch sets separate, as they modify some of
> the same files.
> 
> I ran three sets of tests with three or more 5 minute runs for each
> case.  The results (log files and graphs) are in these directories...
> 
>   1) sched-fifo -- as a baseline
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-fifo
> 
>   2) sched-iso -- Con's scheduler, no privileges
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso
> 
>   3) nice-20 -- Ingo's "nice --20" scheduler hack
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/nice-20

thanks for the testing. The important result is that nice--20
performance is roughly the same as SCHED_ISO. This somewhat
reduces the urgency of the introduction of SCHED_ISO.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/