Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261470AbVAVQ4V (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261414AbVAVQ4V (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:63928 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262592AbVAVQ4N (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:56:13 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:54:58 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Jack O'Quin" Cc: Paul Davis , Con Kolivas , linux , rlrevell@joe-job.com, CK Kernel , utz , Andrew Morton , alexn@dsv.su.se, Rui Nuno Capela Subject: Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling Message-ID: <20050122165458.GA14426@elte.hu> References: <200501201542.j0KFgOwo019109@localhost.localdomain> <87y8eo9hed.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050120172506.GA20295@elte.hu> <87wtu6fho8.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wtu6fho8.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 29 * Jack O'Quin wrote: > I finally made new kernel builds for the latest patches from both Ingo > and Con. I kept the two patch sets separate, as they modify some of > the same files. > > I ran three sets of tests with three or more 5 minute runs for each > case. The results (log files and graphs) are in these directories... > > 1) sched-fifo -- as a baseline > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-fifo > > 2) sched-iso -- Con's scheduler, no privileges > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso > > 3) nice-20 -- Ingo's "nice --20" scheduler hack > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/nice-20 thanks for the testing. The important result is that nice--20 performance is roughly the same as SCHED_ISO. This somewhat reduces the urgency of the introduction of SCHED_ISO. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/