Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262611AbVAVSIq (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:08:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262614AbVAVSIp (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:08:45 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:24594 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262611AbVAVRrW (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:47:22 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:47:18 +0000 From: Russell King To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel List Subject: I2C algorithm IDs Message-ID: <20050122174718.A27993@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Greg KH , Linux Kernel List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 17 Greg, Are I2C algorithm IDs supposed to be unique? Do they have any meaning in reality at all? If the answer is yes to either of these questions, the following should probably be resolved: #define I2C_ALGO_PCA 0x150000 /* PCA 9564 style adapters */ #define I2C_ALGO_SIBYTE 0x150000 /* Broadcom SiByte SOCs */ -- Russell King - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/