Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261330AbVAWRB7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:01:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261331AbVAWRB7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:01:59 -0500 Received: from dns.toxicfilms.tv ([150.254.37.24]:28822 "EHLO dns.toxicfilms.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261330AbVAWRB6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:01:58 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Toxic-Mail-From: solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv via dns X-Qmail-Scanner-Toxic-Rcpt-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Qmail-Scanner-Toxic: 1.24st (Clear:RC:1(213.238.102.237):. Processed in 0.154238 secs Process 12578) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:11:45 +0100 From: Maciej Soltysiak X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Maciej Soltysiak X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <246561836.20050123181145@dns.toxicfilms.tv> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Support for Large Block Devices MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 446 Lines: 17 Hi, I was wondering... Why is "Support for Large Block Devices" still an option? Shouldn't it be compiled in always? Or maybe there are some cons like incompatibility or something? Regards, Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/