Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261784AbVAYDdA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:33:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261788AbVAYDdA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:33:00 -0500 Received: from fmr14.intel.com ([192.55.52.68]:25245 "EHLO fmsfmr002.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261784AbVAYDc6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:32:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/29] x86-i8259-shutdown From: Len Brown To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1106623970.2399.205.camel@d845pe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 24 Jan 2005 22:32:50 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 983 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 02:31, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Eric W. Biederman > > This patch disables interrupt generation from the legacy pic on > reboot. Now that there is a sys_device class it should not be called > while drivers are still using interrupts. > > There is a report about this breaking ACPI power off on some systems. > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 > However the final comment seems to exhonorate this code. So until > I get more information I believe that was a false positive. No, the last comment in the bug report (davej says that there were poweroff problems in FC) does not exhonerate this patch. All it says is that there are additional poweroff bugs out there. -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/