Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261792AbVAYDyl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:54:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261797AbVAYDyl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:54:41 -0500 Received: from mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.187]:55267 "EHLO mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261792AbVAYDyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:54:38 -0500 Message-ID: <41F5C347.4030605@kolivas.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:55:51 +1100 From: Con Kolivas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas Cc: "Jack O'Quin" , Ingo Molnar , linux , CK Kernel , Rui Nuno Capela Subject: Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling References: <200501201542.j0KFgOwo019109@localhost.localdomain> <87y8eo9hed.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050120172506.GA20295@elte.hu> <87wtu6fho8.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050122165458.GA14426@elte.hu> <87pszvlvma.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <41F42BD2.4000709@kolivas.org> <877jm3ljo9.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <41F44AC2.1080609@kolivas.org> <87hdl7v3ik.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <87651nv356.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <87ekgbqr2a.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <41F49735.5000400@kolivas.org> <873bwrpb4o.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <41F57D94.4010500@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <41F57D94.4010500@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1152 Lines: 26 Con Kolivas wrote: > -cc list trimmed to those who have recently responded. > > > Here is a patch to go on top of 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 that fixes some bugs in > the general SCHED_ISO code, fixes the priority support between ISO > threads, and implements SCHED_ISO_RR and SCHED_ISO_FIFO as separate > policies. Note the bugfixes and cleanups mean the codepaths in this are > leaner than the original ISO2 implementation despite the extra features. > > This works safely and effectively on UP (but not tested on SMP yet) so > Jack if/when you get a chance I'd love to see more benchmarks from you > on this one. It seems on my machine the earlier ISO2 implementation > without priority nor FIFO was enough for good results, but not on yours, > which makes your testcase a more discriminating one. Sorry, I see yet another flaw in the design and SMP is broken so hold off testing for a bit. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/