Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261989AbVAYP5G (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:57:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261991AbVAYP5F (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:57:05 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.191]:47311 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261989AbVAYP4p (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:56:45 -0500 From: Elias da Silva Organization: aurigatec Informationssysteme GmbH To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c, Video DVD playback support Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:52:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200501220327.38236.silva@aurigatec.de> <200501251029.22646.silva@aurigatec.de> <1106656675.14787.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1106656675.14787.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: Jens Axboe , lkml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501251652.51452.silva@aurigatec.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:71cf304d62c8802a383a5ddf42c5bd08 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1469 Lines: 42 On Tuesday 25 January 2005 13:44, you wrote: : On Maw, 2005-01-25 at 09:29, Elias da Silva wrote: : > On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:01, you wrote: : > Yes, sometimes you have to risk broken software in favor of augmented : > security, but so far we only have broken software. : : Well let me see in 2.6.5 if you could read open the block device at all : you could erase the drive firmware. I think we've significantly improved : security actually. Alan, please don't let us loose focus! I'm talking about the classification of the opcodes a. GPCMD_SEND_KEY and b. GPCMD_SET_STREAMING as only "save for write" in scsi_ioctl.c:verify_command() since kernel version 2.6.8. The intended security improvements of this restriction can be completed circumvented by using a. cdrom_ioctl (..., DVD_AUTH,...) instead of b. cdrom_ioctl (..., CDROM_SEND_PACKET,...) so the result is as described: "no security improvements at the cost of broken software". The changes looked random to me and I would like to see a clear concept, which would drive the necessary changes for improved security and stability. I'm putting my finger on some loose ends below drivers/cdrom, drivers/ide and drivers/block. Regards, Elias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/