Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262394AbVAZIob (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:44:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262395AbVAZIoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:44:30 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:28339 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262394AbVAZIo2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:44:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:44:19 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jens Axboe Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, alexn@dsv.su.se, kas@fi.muni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lennert.vanalboom@ugent.be Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? Message-Id: <20050126004419.26aab4a5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050126084005.GB2751@suse.de> References: <20050123091154.GC16648@suse.de> <20050123011918.295db8e8.akpm@osdl.org> <20050123095608.GD16648@suse.de> <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@osdl.org> <1106528219.867.22.camel@boxen> <20050124204659.GB19242@suse.de> <20050124125649.35f3dafd.akpm@osdl.org> <20050126080152.GA2751@suse.de> <20050126001113.30933eef.akpm@osdl.org> <20050126084005.GB2751@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1299 Lines: 34 Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > > But the 2.6.11-rcX vm is still very > > > screwy, to get something close to nice and smooth behaviour I have to > > > run a fillmem every now and then to reclaim used memory. > > > > Can you provide more details? > > Hmm not really, I just seem to have a very large piece of > non-cache/buffer memory that seems reluctant to shrink on light memory > pressure. If it's not pagecache then what is it? slab? > This makes the box feel sluggish, if I force reclaim by > running fillmem and swapping on/off again, it feels much better. before-n-after /proc/meminfo would be interesting. If you actually meant that is _is_ sticky pagecache then perhaps the recent mark_page_accessed() changes in filemap.c, although I'd be surprised. > I should mention that this is with 2.6.bk + andreas oom patches that he > asked me to test. I can try 2.6.11-rc2-bkX if you think I should. They shouldn't be causing this sort of thing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/