Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262506AbVAZXfO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:35:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262455AbVAZXUd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:20:33 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:18963 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262462AbVAZSGE (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:06:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:06:02 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jean Delvare , Greg KH , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage Message-ID: <20050126180601.GB5297@stusta.de> References: <20050124175449.GK3515@stusta.de> <20050124213442.GC18933@kroah.com> <20050124214751.GA6396@infradead.org> <20050125060256.GB2061@kroah.com> <20050125195918.460f2b10.khali@linux-fr.org> <20050126003927.189640d4@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> <20050125224051.190b5ff9.khali@linux-fr.org> <20050126013556.247b74bc@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru> <20050126101434.GA7897@infradead.org> <1106737157.5257.139.camel@uganda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1106737157.5257.139.camel@uganda> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2018 Lines: 52 On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:59:17PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 10:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:35:56AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > I have one rule - if noone answers that it means noone objects, > > > or it is not interesting for anyone, and thus noone objects. > > > > That's simply not true. The amount of patches submitted is extremly > > huge and the reviewers don't have time to look at everythning. > > > > If no one replies it simply means no one has looked at it in enough > > detail to comment yet. > > That is why I resent it several times. > Then I asked for inclusion. > > I never send it to lkml just because simple static/non static + module > name > discussion in lkml already overflowed into more than 20 messages... Your opinion on some things are different than the opinions of other people on some issues. That's normal. Then a discussion arises. That's normal and part of a review of some code. E.g. the "module name discussion" covered a real problem. Be it 1 email or be it 100 emails - the main point is simply that all code in the kernel should be as good as possible and as near as possible to kernel standards. The Linux kernel is a big project with _many_ people involved. I've also had people telling me that this or that I sent in a patch was nonsense. That's normal (and a criticism of your code is not meant as a personal insult) and leads to better code in the kernel. > Evgeniy Polyakov cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/