Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262106AbVAZXrw (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:47:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262105AbVAZXrX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:47:23 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:8654 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262106AbVAZTVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:21:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:21:45 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: "Robert W. Fuller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: porting Linux to a virtual machine Message-ID: <20050126112145.Y469@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <41F7377E.8050106@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <41F7377E.8050106@sbcglobal.net>; from orangemagicbus@sbcglobal.net on Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:23:58AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 974 Lines: 21 * Robert W. Fuller (orangemagicbus@sbcglobal.net) wrote: > Has anybody ported Linux to a virtual machine? Does anybody have any > pointers aside from the lkml's abbreviated FAQ entry concering porting > to a new processor? What would be the best way of going about this? Is > there a supported architecture that is simpler than the others and/or > better to use as a model? What about the UML (User Mode Linux) > architecture? Are there doc's, FAQ's, etc. concerning this? Should I > just read the mailing list and harvest the source code? Thank you for > any (positive) input. See Xen, s390, and power5 for starters. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/