Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262257AbVA0AWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:22:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262496AbVA0AW2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:22:28 -0500 Received: from [205.233.219.253] ([205.233.219.253]:14545 "EHLO conifer.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262497AbVAZXIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:08:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:08:06 -0500 From: Jody McIntyre To: "Trever L. Adams" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: IEEE-1394 and disks Message-ID: <20050126230806.GG18792@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca> References: <1106250812.3413.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1106250812.3413.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1961 Lines: 50 On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 12:53:32PM -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote: > I have a few questions: How stable is firewire (running at 800Mbps or > faster, if any is available yet)? How stable is the Linux subsystem, > especially for firewire disks? Is there any particularly 800Mbps bridge > chips that should be avoided or used? The sbp2 subsystem has stability problems, but I'm not exactly sure what they are. The core also has a few issues, but I don't think they'll affect you. This assumes you're running the latest from linux1394.org svn as there are quite a few unmerged changes (which will hopefully make it in to 2.6.12). > How stable is the subsystem when the chain is nearly full (62 devices is > full right?) Having lots of devices shouldn't make any difference, one way or the other. 62 devices is full. For performance reasons, a tree topology is preferred to daisy chaining all the devices. > How many controllers may be in the system before the Firewire subsystem > gets confused? Again, it shouldn't matter. I'm not sure if the SCSI subsystem imposes a limit on the number of drives. I suggest asking future 1394 questions on one of the linux1394 lists: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=2252 - someone may even have tried what you're attempting. Jody > > Trever Adams > -- > "There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a > miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle." -- Albert > Einstein > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/