Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] qcom: dts: thermal cleanups
To:     Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
References: <cover.1553853990.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
 <5583cae1-8fea-724a-24a4-59b38a205ac3@free.fr>
 <CAP245DUNo02QUkGDPFfzow9535GKO9x6ZusETRjEgTmnHL4D2g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
Message-ID: <842b06c6-15b2-7ba6-702e-c8b043d390a6@free.fr>
Date:   Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:31:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP245DUNo02QUkGDPFfzow9535GKO9x6ZusETRjEgTmnHL4D2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 02/04/2019 20:46, Amit Kucheria wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:58 PM Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>> On 29/03/2019 11:12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Devices that are not associated with cooling-maps use the 'hot' type
>>> - Remove critical trip from such devices too and restrict that type of CPUs
>>> - For 8916, add the sensor on the modem
>>>
>>> Description:
>>> - Expose all temperature sensors on msm8916, msm996, msm8998, sdm845
>>> - split up the register address map for msm8998
>>> - standardize names of the various thermal-zones across boards to make it
>>>   easy for test scripts to parse
>>
>> This is what I see on msm8998 with your patch series applied on top of
>> yesterday's next:
>>
>> # dmesg | grep of_parse_thermal_zones
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu0-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu1-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu2-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu3-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu4-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu5-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu6-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu7-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-bottom zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-top zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster0-mhm-thermal zone -22
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-mhm-thermal zone -22
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-l2-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build modem-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build mem-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build wlan-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build q6-dsp-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build camera-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build multimedia-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build pm8998 zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build battery-thermal zone 0
>> of_parse_thermal_zones: build skin-thermal zone 0
>>
>> NB: -EINVAL for cluster0-mhm-thermal and cluster1-mhm-thermal
>>
>>
>> # cat /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp
>> 35800
>> 35200
>> 34500
>> 34800
>> 34500
>> 34100
>> 34100
>> 33500
>> 33800
>> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone17/temp: Invalid argument
>> 36100
>> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone19/temp: Invalid argument
>> 35500
>> 36100
>> 35800
>> 35200
>> 35500
>> 36100
>> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone8/temp: Invalid argument
>> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone9/temp: Invalid argument
>>
>>
>> Are the failures expected?
>> (cluster*-mhm-thermal and thermal_zone*/temp)
> 
> No they are not. Unfortunately, I didn't have HW to test, so
> appreciate the help with testing. I'll check the 8, 9, 17 and 19 again
> before resubmitting.

Looks like Andy merged this series?

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git/log/?h=for-next

I was expecting a respin, or a discussion of the failures.

Slightly confused. What next?

Regards.