Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262022AbVA0HnM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:43:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262091AbVA0HnM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:43:12 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]:48339 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262022AbVA0HnH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:43:07 -0500 Message-ID: <41F89B9F.8010605@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:43:27 -0500 From: John Richard Moser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041211) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu CC: Al Viro , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc parent &proc_root == NULL? References: <41F82218.1080705@comcast.net> <41F84313.4030509@osdl.org> <41F8530C.6010305@comcast.net> <20050127031539.GK8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <41F86176.3010000@comcast.net> <200501270640.j0R6eD7N000647@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <41F88F59.6040904@comcast.net> <200501270710.j0R7AhIN003672@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200501270710.j0R7AhIN003672@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1562 Lines: 44 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:51:05 EST, John Richard Moser said: > > >>mmm. I'd thought about that actually-- for modules to get a whack at >>this they'd have to be compiled in. Loaded as modules would break the >>security. > > > And that, my friends, is *exactly* why SELinux can't be built as a module ;) :) So far my little grkernsec module hasn't hit any bumps like that; though so far I haven't copied much of spender's code. I'm sure the chroot() restrictions will easily be make for a loadable module. At this point, I should be making more important design decisions. For example, why am I still doing this? Isn't there something better for me to do than clone LSM and GrSecurity, attempt (*cough*) to improve on the original designs, and then harass kernel devs about problems I'm having with things that are just meant to be toys for me anyway? - -- All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB+JuehDd4aOud5P8RAg+WAJ451ls4FIMG0wm/r3pa/dPpcasRugCeP5j9 be2STVV+vC2B1ScYYQNmMY0= =IjCv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/