Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3867201yba; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzx31DeHxICph1GM/TqcNy90V9xzpFUJuu9aAx9gao95CfLOi5jHnaWvtsvxnPvAUFKwEG3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a988:: with SMTP id bh8mr8664669plb.243.1556042048478; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:54:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556042048; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BPqYARBHXzw/hsspibVcsZO5Z5tZ3YBdpAD76pbbug4W7S4cNMawY+Vv/dOg+epfnY aZ1LLnUJg4l4bihX/q3syNA4QVytfeY6R7+UP7Ga0BDWYPs53HjH3rA5uSzhxodTeBPn 682vWvfOUKl2sr5H5RZYofsI9AZOKRR+NxqMHeA0+MVAqdUYlQepnFueA/y3Axm6e/g+ bc2p/XUqcQ4j95OCU1qIcJ8mFBXZWt+iFzrRyWZRDD/aI5Hc1yOVZ1cc85PI2UY3hEQz I/34Ux8NVfTrYoC+oinaII6juDVnlkQfP2cFsxvOozVOCh4cdJFAdw/B5t0KCk7cHGXT Qy8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=9cK1low0cdZTmXzlVvdo+OE2oi9lIMPaxtkx31fLyLs=; b=GNKVwyKdpavTuddISgq7vgQCXmfNBWeeum4OvXzc1kiqaV+WTrqVDUnoJEt4Mxhihh ern36CPcoBboPvhnbmfgchMbEBe0NT96YgIxikIV7Qi6k/mlNqhSBYHbhjFmq16QbE/c +j4TzgeWVdZ8PRmWq2MOgixexBPUMjzmdNh7hZb7SIEd6FutanjCJyUjIQuROEMsiIVb 5LevvgNIWIfrVoxZe6BU5huyp2P8K3m0tvLUVLEISGgmLMaQMNarJkTY2VQ/On8IVkja ZJ7oc5hM8JyOQTeT483zRNXNTvL9ODl98IwT9YvgUFJ19yr/FnJI63cfi8mpbshgPedt qlWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o19si14766366pgv.355.2019.04.23.10.53.53; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728550AbfDWRwz (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:52:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42434 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726655AbfDWRwz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:52:55 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009C3AF92; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 19:52:52 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Yang Shi Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: thp: fix false negative of shmem vma's THP eligibility Message-ID: <20190423175252.GP25106@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1556037781-57869-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556037781-57869-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 24-04-19 00:43:01, Yang Shi wrote: > The commit 7635d9cbe832 ("mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each > vma") introduced THPeligible bit for processes' smaps. But, when checking > the eligibility for shmem vma, __transparent_hugepage_enabled() is > called to override the result from shmem_huge_enabled(). It may result > in the anonymous vma's THP flag override shmem's. For example, running a > simple test which create THP for shmem, but with anonymous THP disabled, > when reading the process's smaps, it may show: > > 7fc92ec00000-7fc92f000000 rw-s 00000000 00:14 27764 /dev/shm/test > Size: 4096 kB > ... > [snip] > ... > ShmemPmdMapped: 4096 kB > ... > [snip] > ... > THPeligible: 0 > > And, /proc/meminfo does show THP allocated and PMD mapped too: > > ShmemHugePages: 4096 kB > ShmemPmdMapped: 4096 kB > > This doesn't make too much sense. The anonymous THP flag should not > intervene shmem THP. Calling shmem_huge_enabled() with checking > MMF_DISABLE_THP sounds good enough. And, we could skip stack and > dax vma check since we already checked if the vma is shmem already. Kirill, can we get a confirmation that this is really intended behavior rather than an omission please? Is this documented? What is a global knob to simply disable THP system wise? I have to say that the THP tuning API is one giant mess :/ Btw. this patch also seem to fix khugepaged behavior because it previously ignored both VM_NOHUGEPAGE and MMF_DISABLE_THP. > Fixes: 7635d9cbe832 ("mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each vma") > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Vlastimil Babka > Cc: David Rientjes > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > --- > v2: Check VM_NOHUGEPAGE per Michal Hocko > > mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++-- > mm/shmem.c | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 165ea46..5881e82 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > { > if (vma_is_anonymous(vma)) > return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma); > - if (vma_is_shmem(vma) && shmem_huge_enabled(vma)) > - return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma); > + if (vma_is_shmem(vma)) > + return shmem_huge_enabled(vma); > > return false; > } > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c > index 2275a0f..6f09a31 100644 > --- a/mm/shmem.c > +++ b/mm/shmem.c > @@ -3873,6 +3873,9 @@ bool shmem_huge_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > loff_t i_size; > pgoff_t off; > > + if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) || > + test_bit(MMF_DISABLE_THP, &vma->vm_mm->flags)) > + return false; > if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE) > return true; > if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_DENY) > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs