Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4012239yba; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyK0IOk1N6PlVC3NIkXet7c+ag41MZwyYXaWPiOTorbO9/wn7Wnat8eRiSe+oIL/ltVDlnn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb90:: with SMTP id m16mr28617781pls.340.1556051388559; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:29:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556051388; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WyGEblf2DAfe2TqBSSS4pUWLCsRq4DDZ0OB76ZcJiFP8lWoa/FhyUKtZ4ExY+kBM8M f/8WHU1viF0OFjIGHHuv9kpD+qm5hdCddd4aA3GnPooW+kFYzO77hTCR8NIUaIXdGYWD 1erUwBc+C9s4ZsV8ilkeKz/MS8Cs1aVXpgq6Em4ZrRHnGbVbjhm1ulI1wFXv2gARV9CT g/UbK+QfwTRNlFcWZXYao82cQoqFDSjraHeTh6q/njhTlHq5VjP0KlatNSwOvtFO58X1 HLVEf+US7EAVbhNoMtFJkOli3BIdWu6x8Nmxsy9bIqaYAypvj1erC7g4mAuwOwwKBc58 LXxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=N1nGNZ0CjP0rdp0L9p7A7wgp2ivxNA8v2ysdTAuLczA=; b=cOd8ehxGIGNXGYriFzoX5HmIQK1U6liRgjJbIYDOQlMzuHOJdsXQGBULwsUuKh6Ure +Fw7Ivx+kQsSDBEcdBgfM+aVqpJLGeDxaoNfsJq27HSnLoxG+Pc3Vom994MCv4LdgtWf KXXen1YLXeElGRDOCmJZiZ5PTEADwEFoC7NTpurcEQdpLyLR1ls15g1zPOwkWVjrj32X aD1CkLQgYuBcBR8LJ9pVF0n86k8qEfOaMBjWtQKu2+hCoI+uccdugTs8/GBFkCiJU/fY xd3iw+iihkRN4qia3+f1pAh6E0tQSxH3+jI+vLHgghzq3Glvx0w+64Sqdcgs9f9oSUeb Z5+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w34si9020642pla.250.2019.04.23.13.29.33; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727268AbfDWU2a (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:28:30 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57990 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726088AbfDWU2a (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:28:30 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4096EAC94; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 20:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:28:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 5.0.x] Windows XP broken on KVM In-Reply-To: References: <20190418075328.GA19532@kroah.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:05:34 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:53:28 +0200, > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 09:38:52AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > we've got a regression report on the recent 5.0.x kernel, starting > > > from 5.0.6, where Windows XP can't boot on KVM any longer. > > > > > > The culprit seems to be the patch > > > KVM: x86: update %rip after emulating IO > > > with the upstream commit 45def77ebf79e2e8942b89ed79294d97ce914fa0. > > > Reverting this alone fixed the problem. > > > > > > The report is found at openSUSE bugzilla: > > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132694 > > > > > > Is there already a followup fix? If not, we need to revert it from > > > stable, at least. > > > > Is this also a problem in 5.1-rc5? > > Only 5.0.x has been tested, so far. > I'll ask the reporter to try 5.1-rc if Paolo can't reproduce the > problem in his side. The reporter confirmed that the problem is present with the latest 5.1-rc kernel, too. FWIW, it's a Ryzen system. Check the bugzilla URL above for details. thanks, Takashi