Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [kvmtool PATCH v10 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a vcpu feature for
 pointer authentication
To:     Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1555994558-26349-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>
 <1555994558-26349-6-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>
 <20190423154625.GP3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
From:   Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Message-ID: <3b7bafc9-5d6a-7845-ef1f-577ea59000e2@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:32:22 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190423154625.GP3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 4/23/19 9:16 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:12:38AM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patch adds a runtime capabality for KVM tool to enable Arm64 8.3
>> Pointer Authentication in guest kernel. Two vcpu features
>> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_[ADDRESS/GENERIC] are supplied together to enable
>> Pointer Authentication in KVM guest after checking the capability.
>>
>> Command line options --enable-ptrauth and --disable-ptrauth are added
>> to use this feature. However, if those options are not provided then
>> also this feature is enabled if host supports this capability.
>>
>> The macros defined in the headers are not in sync and should be replaced
>> from the upstream.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v9:
>> * Added a error check for both enable-ptrauth and disable-ptrauth
>>    option.
>> * Make the error explicit when enable-ptrauth is provided [Dave Martin].
>>
>>   arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h    |  1 +
>>   arm/aarch64/include/asm/kvm.h             |  2 ++
>>   arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-config-arch.h |  6 +++++-
>>   arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h    |  2 ++
>>   arm/include/arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h  |  2 ++
>>   arm/kvm-cpu.c                             | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>   include/linux/kvm.h                       |  2 ++
>>   7 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> index d28ea67..520ea76 100644
>> --- a/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> +++ b/arm/aarch32/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@
>>   #define ARM_CPU_ID		0, 0, 0
>>   #define ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR	5
>>   
>> +#define ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_FEATURE	0
>>   #endif /* KVM__KVM_CPU_ARCH_H */
>> diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/asm/kvm.h b/arm/aarch64/include/asm/kvm.h
>> index 97c3478..a2546e6 100644
>> --- a/arm/aarch64/include/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ struct kvm_regs {
>>   #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT		1 /* CPU running a 32bit VM */
>>   #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2		2 /* CPU uses PSCI v0.2 */
>>   #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3		3 /* Support guest PMUv3 */
>> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS	5 /* CPU uses address pointer authentication */
>> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC	6 /* CPU uses generic pointer authentication */
>>   
>>   struct kvm_vcpu_init {
>>   	__u32 target;
>> diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-config-arch.h b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-config-arch.h
>> index 04be43d..0279b13 100644
>> --- a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-config-arch.h
>> +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-config-arch.h
>> @@ -8,7 +8,11 @@
>>   			"Create PMUv3 device"),				\
>>   	OPT_U64('\0', "kaslr-seed", &(cfg)->kaslr_seed,			\
>>   			"Specify random seed for Kernel Address Space "	\
>> -			"Layout Randomization (KASLR)"),
>> +			"Layout Randomization (KASLR)"),		\
>> +	OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "enable-ptrauth", &(cfg)->enable_ptrauth,	\
>> +			"Enables pointer authentication"),		\
>> +	OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "disable-ptrauth", &(cfg)->disable_ptrauth,	\
>> +			"Disables pointer authentication"),
>>   
>>   #include "arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h"
>>   
>> diff --git a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> index a9d8563..fcc2107 100644
>> --- a/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> +++ b/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h
>> @@ -17,4 +17,6 @@
>>   #define ARM_CPU_CTRL		3, 0, 1, 0
>>   #define ARM_CPU_CTRL_SCTLR_EL1	0
>>   
>> +#define ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_FEATURE	((1UL << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) \
>> +					| (1UL << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC))
>>   #endif /* KVM__KVM_CPU_ARCH_H */
>> diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h
>> index 5734c46..1b4287d 100644
>> --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h
>> +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-config-arch.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ struct kvm_config_arch {
>>   	bool		aarch32_guest;
>>   	bool		has_pmuv3;
>>   	u64		kaslr_seed;
>> +	bool		enable_ptrauth;
>> +	bool		disable_ptrauth;
>>   	enum irqchip_type irqchip;
>>   	u64		fw_addr;
>>   };
>> diff --git a/arm/kvm-cpu.c b/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> index 7780251..acd1d5f 100644
>> --- a/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> +++ b/arm/kvm-cpu.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,18 @@ struct kvm_cpu *kvm_cpu__arch_init(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long cpu_id)
>>   		vcpu_init.features[0] |= (1UL << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* Check Pointer Authentication command line arguments. */
>> +	if (kvm->cfg.arch.enable_ptrauth && kvm->cfg.arch.disable_ptrauth)
>> +		die("Both enable-ptrauth and disable-ptrauth option cannot be present");
> 
> Preferably, print the leading dashes, the same as the user would see
> on the command line (e.g., --enable-ptrauth, --disable-ptrauth).
> 
> For brevity, we could write something like:
> 
> 		die("--enable-ptrauth conflicts with --disable-ptrauth");
> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Always enable Pointer Authentication if system supports
>> +	 * this extension unless disable-ptrauth option is present.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (kvm__supports_extension(kvm, KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) &&
>> +	    kvm__supports_extension(kvm, KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_GENERIC) &&
>> +	    !kvm->cfg.arch.disable_ptrauth)
>> +			vcpu_init.features[0] |= ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_FEATURE;
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * If the preferred target ioctl is successful then
>>   	 * use preferred target else try each and every target type
>> @@ -106,8 +118,12 @@ struct kvm_cpu *kvm_cpu__arch_init(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long cpu_id)
>>   			die("Unable to find matching target");
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (err || target->init(vcpu))
>> -		die("Unable to initialise vcpu");
>> +	if (err || target->init(vcpu)) {
>> +		if (kvm->cfg.arch.enable_ptrauth)
>> +			die("Unable to initialise vcpu with pointer authentication feature");
> 
> We don't special-case this error message for any other feature yet:
> there are a variety of reasons why we might have failed, so suggesting
> that the failure is something to do with ptrauth may be misleading to
> the user.
> 
> If we want to be more informative, we could do something like the
> following:
> 
> 	bool supported;
> 
> 	supported = kvm__supports_extension(kvm, KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) &&
> 		    kvm__supports_extension(kvm, KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_GENERIC);
> 
> 	if (kvm->cfg.arch.enable_ptrauth && !supported)
> 		die("--enable-ptrauth not supported on this host");
> 
> 	if (supported && !kvm->cfg.arch.disable_ptrauth)
> 		vcpu_init.features[0] |= ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_FEATURE;
> 
> 	/* ... */
> 
> 	if (err || target->init(vcpu))
> 		die("Unable to initialise vcpu");
> 
> We don't do this for any other feature today, but since it helps the
> user to understand what went wrong it's probably a good idea.
Yes this is more clear. As Mark has picked the core guest ptrauth 
patches. I will post this changes as standalone.

Thanks,
Amit Daniel
> 
> [...]
> 
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>