Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvowwePJHEMRkaabx-NxLoJ5f8_QziPFyQUui+bmAaT1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJfpegvowwePJHEMRkaabx-NxLoJ5f8_QziPFyQUui+bmAaT1w@mail.gmail.com> <155372999953.7602.13784796495137723805.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <155373036414.7602.7964458548629410897.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 44/68] vfs: Convert fuse to use the new mount API
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3077.1556119203.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:22:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3217.1556119323@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> Should I be applying this, together with the vfs dependencies?  Or
> will you take care of these?

I'm hoping Al will take the entire series.

> One minor comment is that fuse conventionally uses "struct fuse_conn
> *fc", so "struct fs_context *fc" is confusing here.  There's one place
> you use "struct fs_context *fsc", which seems the right thing to do
> for all the cases.

Except in ceph, where "struct ceph_fs_client *fsc" is a common thing...

David