Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp735704yba; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFe0N4UnSwG/UQilgm+9Dg88cEP4zTzFu5hYSOH8J6DxOKvc4TNkkGuqChtgB0FBvfNIiM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7883:: with SMTP id q3mr33087381pll.60.1556120787436; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556120787; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J2e6pf66OYnxrpg6KUj7JBJdIFtroZIzS6IRMW4fwmDnoUqoayvthZAPGOuq+w5GM/ FbsAXVZs/x2DqaYaobOLW7GhL5rwcBg692SYS26X8ETzp9cAoIugHn+A63eK7e51EJon l77ab0fRawFw2211URu4HCFQ1beeRTLZYZxTd7siVNG9yVVjigSugKxtHKni//dRMppn yiJSKQ1xdm7gE/IFh500671q55NHjzAywgOu3v5mKBOLSxTtIPIGqKbLi1mstwZHgDbM 7G92Wo9Hgs1mNTqvsmJab37R8tmWqYATu8IwwmLspR9DWtgOz4rLCtppCIerSpsGDv8/ n/Jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=q7WSIh9tM2TxgGzor5rkdG1GAeOpYYpfQAugKcQ7blA=; b=sH1v3N4tpZ49UXnqe6IiRNU2eyBVwWv9V5ssQwur6/jNQD9DDwYMFJplAPa//siApr 3jUL4S9fqOxLJ2V8Ww6M1qRAJt5AX+ZN9KQ2e9KYljpnyJYZYQkjqMA8QfosdCUTHBpj 6mB2uxpAfuXeXA41ELQAzzCXNUuxwNFUsGFa4RV8XixTLiEzM50fMxx6Y90xD8VRyEBS z4MdyihGFtk3z3yyd+GUYAjw4dWjfAOI1yFUR/8xNQdOPVhOfBnYT1BjmsIiyTsOsbi1 jbgEeNSbJ70nYFP43fcEDjfO5JsXb1PEEPrgtNM/vH8IDWq98dFHPPXbevBFD6KXMrrV Yksg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f62si17871355plb.339.2019.04.24.08.46.10; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731404AbfDXPpK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:45:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([185.25.65.24]:14748 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727327AbfDXPpK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:45:10 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,390,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="89241361" Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:45:04 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Boris Ostrovsky CC: , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/pvh: correctly setup the PV EFI interface for dom0 Message-ID: <20190424154504.vzkkobxsesc3oval@Air-de-Roger> References: <20190423130416.68935-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20190423130416.68935-2-roger.pau@citrix.com> <2359c97c-1125-cfd2-44c2-7e9ce7972558@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2359c97c-1125-cfd2-44c2-7e9ce7972558@oracle.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 4/23/19 9:04 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > This involves initializing the boot params EFI related fields and the > > efi global variable. > > > > Without this fix a PVH dom0 doesn't detect when booted from EFI, and > > thus doesn't support accessing any of the EFI related data. > > > > Reported-by: PGNet Dev > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monn? > > Hmm.. This seems to be breaking save/restore for me (for domU), and I > can't see any obvious reasons. > > Can you try it? Sure, thanks for the extra testing! I have to admit I haven't tested save/restore with this patch applied, it didn't come to mind it might affect that functionality. I assume it's save/restore of a PVH domU that's broken (HVM and PV are fine)? Thanks, Roger.