Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp771845yba; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:19:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLwsrq5UW2fvZiL0NefSiu7m94bEIml4S+QTeZiFEe92fypPmGgNL/qf9AIZVJkis6GU4v X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9048:: with SMTP id w8mr33017590plz.195.1556122797031; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:19:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556122797; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cyjwxIWy+Ll7Gv6rN1QxY7JV1rRv3LNT/nwcWFoUSMj8GE4AzS+n4uepX7e3rFgV1Q 1EGLloEYXczpCxNP361oTPtTpzhDcsoRPEdB+mJRmQw9soH6t88yWomwgnkEExVC+2mE yDiQibgFjO6bxMumDQ0cGdWTTwFhfzCgs6jO5CnNAXmVO37bWxS2i4o14hOnaliZ5eKq QBJo2GPuWX9I3B5iRhXUy0uxyl2GYLC68T5jcqo5bfwefjgi+oSM9QIUK60jTZT3L/u0 gflWXoy5rNIWzWLLq+knvwKIcapsh2kanWyCGxYyjmbDJJJpzMsk/KlKN3TPeiAq+MGN Ew1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=YeXF3n9ac0WVkwElMEPy7ToJqkGdNnl5F6NBCtZTLLY=; b=VRVwUEBrvyJNEJ7I+B2VfsNV1kjlH5qz4AAR+Lk0p9AbuppEFevyw0AsjqXusP36yl R0TgnVXcYVclIxjszkO2pU1VHLtGX4PG60NJ9T1H+PvRKgjyyGAd9jaJKYNCDYL1Em+F +SFVer3lHH24vi5zgf1WL9KH3WsIeLFfWNuOTvShvZ/77lWR2Hxyqfe7Bo+B5d5xtuCo EpKV6s3nnHBZQxbreNU33faVIe2PJuwuDdn7dKe5QildXiQpvO0zvC1RD15Q3L6iEQuR mJTVTYM7O9dvl+TpeCAtIc5gxWinrj6HoA/1LBkWqQQVHLuu9aCggqI+gn1Ebdd3QlWU Fpag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r23si17655904pgv.471.2019.04.24.09.19.40; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731122AbfDXQSt (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:18:49 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:55508 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727444AbfDXQSs (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:18:48 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B83E81AA; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:18:46 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Changbin Du Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree Message-ID: <20190424101846.7cc4bad7@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190423162932.21428-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> References: <20190423162932.21428-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:28:29 +0800 Changbin Du wrote: > The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation > from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to > reST format in this serias. > > In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs conversion. As mentioned by others, this is a lot of stuff; I would really rather see each of those groups as separate patch sets. If you can do a reasonably quick turnaround with Mauro's suggestions addressed and tags applied, we should be able to get at least some of this into 5.2. Thanks, Mauro, for looking at all of this stuff! Thanks, jon