Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262611AbVA0Slu (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:41:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262692AbVA0Slu (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:41:50 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37768 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262611AbVA0Sl3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:41:29 -0500 X-Authenticated: #641082 Subject: patches to 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 - make menuconfig shows "v2.6.8.1" From: Viktor Horvath To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-afqvtEVJQrhjuHwi9uHA" Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:40:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1106851254.720.4.camel@Charon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1155 Lines: 40 --=-afqvtEVJQrhjuHwi9uHA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everybody, today I patched myself up from 2.6.7 vanilla to 2.6.10 vanilla, but after all patches succeeded, "make menuconfig" shows "v2.6.8.1 Configuration". Even worse, a compiled kernel calls in his bootlog himself "2.6.8.1". When installing the whole kernel package, this behaviour doesn't show up. Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I could not find an answer in the archives. Have a nice day, Viktor. Please Cc: me when answering. --=-afqvtEVJQrhjuHwi9uHA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBB+TW2O3SWVYLvaJQRAtIgAJ0Tt4svg1ngKgk1qdvd0pPxBQ575wCcCrtT KGh8EMzUyD/7BusKoGa10vQ= =jEsV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-afqvtEVJQrhjuHwi9uHA-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/