Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262712AbVA0TfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:35:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262717AbVA0TfY (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:35:24 -0500 Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([195.101.245.15]:38414 "EHLO p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262712AbVA0TfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:35:05 -0500 Message-ID: <41F9425A.2030101@francetelecom.REMOVE.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:34:50 +0100 From: Julien TINNES User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Richard Moser CC: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch 0/6 virtual address space randomisation References: <20050127101117.GA9760@infradead.org> <41F8D44D.9070409@francetelecom.REMOVE.com> <1106827050.5624.81.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <41F927F2.2080100@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <41F927F2.2080100@comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2005 19:34:00.0308 (UTC) FILETIME=[26920340:01C504A7] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1384 Lines: 33 > > Yeah, if it came from PaX the randomization would actually be useful. > Sorry, I've just woken up and already explained in another post. > Please, no hard feelings. Speaking about implementation of the non executable pages semantics on IA32, PaX and Exec-Shield are very different (well not that much since 2.6 in fact because PAGEEXEC is now "segmentation when I can"). But when it comes to ASLR it's pretty much the same thing. The only difference may be the (very small) randomization of the brk() managed heap on ET_EXEC (which is probably the more "hackish" feature of PaX ASLR) but it seems that Arjan is even going to propose a patch for that (Is this in ES too ?). I think it's a great opportunity here to get the same basis for ASLR in PaX and ES merged into the vanilla kernel. If it's only a matter of changing the number of randomized bits in an additional PaX patch, it's no problem! It's more important to have a correct basis, focus on that. -- Julien TINNES - & france telecom - R&D Division/MAPS/NSS Research Engineer - Internet/Intranet Security GPG: C050 EF1A 2919 FD87 57C4 DEDD E778 A9F0 14B9 C7D6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/