Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261164AbVA0UA1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:00:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261159AbVA0UAJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:00:09 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:43182 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261157AbVA0T7k (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:59:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Arjan van de Ven cc: Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer In-Reply-To: <1106855326.5624.123.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Message-ID: References: <20050127101117.GA9760@infradead.org> <20050127101322.GE9760@infradead.org> <41F92721.1030903@comcast.net> <1106848051.5624.110.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <41F92D2B.4090302@comcast.net> <41F937C0.4050803@comcast.net> <1106855326.5624.123.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 684 Lines: 20 Btw, since you're clearly at the keyboard now: I do agree with Christoph that it would be a lot cleaner to just say that all architectures have to have a arch_align_stack() define, instead of having a __HAVE_ARCH_ALIGN_STACK define. After all, a trivial implementation would apparently just be #define arch_align_stack(x) (x) which is not too much of a bother to maintain for an architecture that doesn't want to do this ;) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/