Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:54:47 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] riscv: remove duplicate macros from ptrace.h
Message-ID: <20190425195447.GA22587@lst.de>
References: <20190411115623.5749-1-hch@lst.de> <20190411115623.5749-8-hch@lst.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1904251208140.17442@viisi.sifive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1904251208140.17442@viisi.sifive.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:13:18PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > No need to have two names for the same thing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> This is probably worth cleaning up across the entire tree.  
> 
> asm-{generic,x86,arm64,powerpc}/ptrace.h all define similar GET_IP/SET_IP
> macros - although it seems that arch/riscv is the only architecture that 
> uses them.

Yes, we had that discussion before.  I've started on a series for that,
but it is unlikely to touch riscv.