Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261215AbVA1I7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:59:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261216AbVA1I7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:59:14 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:9992 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261215AbVA1I7L (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:59:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:58:59 +0000 From: Russell King To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, alexn@dsv.su.se, kas@fi.muni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? Message-ID: <20050128085858.B9486@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, alexn@dsv.su.se, kas@fi.muni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20050123200315.A25351@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050124114853.A16971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050125193207.B30094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127082809.A20510@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@osdl.org> <16888.58622.376497.380197@robur.slu.se> <20050127164918.C3036@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127123326.2eafab35.davem@davemloft.net> <20050128001701.D22695@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127163444.1bfb673b.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050127163444.1bfb673b.davem@davemloft.net>; from davem@davemloft.net on Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:34:44PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1173 Lines: 27 On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:34:44PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:17:01 +0000 > Russell King wrote: > > Yes. Someone suggested this evening that there may have been a recent > > change to do with some IPv6 refcounting which may have caused this > > problem. Is that something you can confirm? > > Yep, it would be this change below. Try backing it out and see > if that makes your leak go away. Thanks. I'll try it, but: 1. Looking at the date of the change it seems unlikely. The recent death occurred with 2.6.10-rc2, booted on 29th November and dying on 19th January, which obviously predates this cset. 2. It'll take a couple of days to confirm the behaviour of the dst cache. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/