Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:45:07 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Direct block mapping through fs for device
Message-ID: <20190426144507.GB178347@magnolia>
References: <20190426013814.GB3350@redhat.com>
 <20190426062816.GG1454@dread.disaster.area>
 <20190426124553.GB12339@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190426124553.GB12339@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:45:53AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:28:16PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > i.e. go look at how xfs_pnfs.c works to hand out block mappings to
> > remote pNFS clients so they can directly access the underlying
> > storage. Basically, anyone wanting to map blocks needs a file layout
> > lease and then to manage the filesystem state over that range via
> > these methods in the struct export_operations:
> > 
> >         int (*get_uuid)(struct super_block *sb, u8 *buf, u32 *len, u64 *offset);
> >         int (*map_blocks)(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> >                           u64 len, struct iomap *iomap,
> >                           bool write, u32 *device_generation);
> >         int (*commit_blocks)(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomaps,
> >                              int nr_iomaps, struct iattr *iattr);
> 
> Nipick:  get_uuid isn't needed for the least itself, it just works
> around the fact that the original pNFS/block protocol is braindead.
> The pNFS/SCSI prototocol already switches to a device UUID, and other
> users that work locally shouldn't need it either.

Hmmm, this lease interface still doesn't support COW, right?

(Right, xfs_pnfs.c bails out with -ENXIO for reflink files)

It occurs to me that maybe we don't want Goldwyn's IOMAP_DAX_COW
approach (hide the read address in the iomap->inline_data pointer); we
just want two physical source addresses.  Then the dax code can turn
that into a memory pointer and file lessees can do sector accesses or
whatever they need to do to write the range before calling
->commit_blocks.

Oh, right, both of you commented about a dual iomap approach on the v2
btrfs dax support series.

/me goes back to drinking coffee.

--D