Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Yang Wei <yang.wei9@zte.com.cn>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] net: ll_temac: Fix support for 64-bit platforms
References: <20190426073231.4008-1-esben@geanix.com>
        <20190426073231.4008-4-esben@geanix.com>
        <20190426114013.333e62c8@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20190426205912.GI4041@lunn.ch>
        <20190426140856.78b786ee@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20190426220226.GW4041@lunn.ch>
        <20190426153056.6c8f64ba@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:49:42 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190426153056.6c8f64ba@cakuba.netronome.com> (Jakub Kicinski's
        message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:30:56 -0700")
Message-ID: <87y33val3t.fsf@geanix.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> writes:

> Looking closer at the series it kind of looks like a soft IP.

It is a soft IP.

> Esben, is there anything architecture specific here?  Should we perhaps
> drop the dependency on the architectures in patch 6 completely?

No, I don't think there is anything really architecture specific here.
Anything with PCIe should be able to utilize the LL TEMAC soft IP and
use this driver.

I don't mind dropping the architecture dependencies.

/Esben