Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:03:09 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Chen, Jason CJ" <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] x86/acrn: Add hypercall for ACRN guest
Message-ID: <20190428100309.GA2334@zn.tnic>
References: <1556067260-9128-1-git-send-email-yakui.zhao@intel.com>
 <1556067260-9128-5-git-send-email-yakui.zhao@intel.com>
 <20190425070712.GA57256@gmail.com>
 <6dd021a9-e2c0-ee84-55fd-3e6dfb4bd944@intel.com>
 <20190425110025.GA16164@zn.tnic>
 <473d145c-4bfd-4ec8-34c3-8a26a78fe40d@intel.com>
 <20190427085816.GB12360@zn.tnic>
 <e04c43cf-029b-d459-e9d9-1a1f5c403dab@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e04c43cf-029b-d459-e9d9-1a1f5c403dab@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 09:56:35AM +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder about the access width.
> It is 64-bit register. What I said is the "movq", not "movl".
> (I understand that movl is incorrect for 64-bit register).

I didn't say anything about movl. I think what you're trying to say is
that because your inputs like hcall_id and param1/2 are unsigned longs,
you want a 64-bit move.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.