Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261529AbVA2SKV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:10:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261528AbVA2SKV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:10:21 -0500 Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56]:43162 "EHLO sccrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261529AbVA2SKO (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:10:14 -0500 Message-ID: <41FBD1AE.2080608@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:10:54 -0500 From: John Richard Moser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041211) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Jakub Jelinek , Rik van Riel , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer References: <1106848051.5624.110.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <41F92D2B.4090302@comcast.net> <41F95F79.6080904@comcast.net> <1106862801.5624.145.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <41F96C7D.9000506@comcast.net> <41FB2DD2.1070405@comcast.net> <20050129173704.GM11199@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <41FBCC91.8010602@comcast.net> <20050129175549.GA2846@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20050129175549.GA2846@infradead.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1354 Lines: 45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:49:05PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: > >>>The ideas in IBM's ProPolice changes are good and worth >>>implementing, but the current implementation is bad. >>> >> >>Lies. I've read the paper on the current implementation, it's >>definitely good. It only operates on C/C++ code though, but that's the >>scope of it. > > > Yeah, I guess your extensive compiler internals experience and knowledge > of gcc internals weights a lot more than the opinion of the gcc team.. > I read "implementation" as "the way it's implemented," not as "the quality of the code." Did I miss the target? *Aims in the other direction then?* > - -- All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB+9GthDd4aOud5P8RAm/FAJwNvbrxPP8fcJmMM//vcYL10nMXTACggi57 jOKfS4FU1sdPL7AjKRgMmBg= =igR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/